data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/00e7a/00e7a671ea145efd72d90db8347a10be425776e1" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d6b5/1d6b54d2dbecdee80e27a0853149417c14930717" alt=""
On a more serious note, why don't they look at what might have actually caused it, rather than knee-jerk-edly blaming music and trench coats? It reminds me of the thing with blaming "emo" for the suicides of Stephanie Gestier and Jodie Gater. And if you're not careful, the dreaded "emo" would come for your kids, too, apparently. It wasn't that they'd apparently suffered some pretty serious bullying at the school they'd attended, which had failed to deal with the issue, and they'd both been depressed.
Apparently the kid who did the shootings at SuccessTech had been involved in fisticuffs (it's my word of the week, apparently) with other kids at the school before. Maybe he'd been bullied, maybe he was depressed... Maybe the apparent readily-available nature of guns with that whole constitutional "bearing arms" thing that contributes somewhat. To paraphrase Dylan Moran (because I haven't watched Monster for a while), "When these school shootings happen in the US, everyone goes, 'Oh, this is horrible, dreadful, HOW could this happen!?' Well... Everybody has guns there. And guns only have a limited range of household possibilities. Unlike a Californian wine, say, which you could use to clean submarines..."
Instead of making misguided judgments and scapegoats and villains from things that really aren't to blame, perhaps it would be better to take a serious look at the factors contributing to such tragic actions. If the problems that can lead to these sort of things occurring are dealt with instead of dying with the victims and occasionally the perpetrators, maybe it could help prevent these things happening.
Surely the majority of these things don't happen without some kind of "cause" that's been compounded over time, which could possibly have been dealt with positively, rather than it being some brainsnap psychotic episode?
6 comments:
Someone who sees it for what it is. Hallelujah. Let us not forget check in with the parenting.
Media!
I think there are a few people out there who see it this way, but the majority appear not to, which is unfortunate. I actually read an article about it earlier that said he was a "devil worshiper."
Nice...
And reading comments on things like news.com.au where lots of people go wild about how evil the kid must have been or whatever is just frustrating.
Maybe they forget how cruel kids can really be to others who are "different," and how that bullying/teasing/cruelty can lead to something inside others dying—maybe causing this sort of situation on the rare occasion—but often just leaving the bullied individuals hurting for months or years to come.
as i've said before, for a country that is all about security, they don't make their citizen's feel very secure. If people begin to believe that they only way they get their point across is to shoot someone, there is SERIOUS problems there!
Just looking at the school, you'd think that yes, there is a serious problem if someone has to "fix" bullying by killing people. But nothing really ever seems to get done about bullies or bullying.
On a larger scale, that might just reflect the overall feel of society there. Although with a bully-boy president... Hmm...
At least they didn't blame video games this time.
But I'm sad they still found a scapegoat. Plus I'll guess that they haven't seen Bowling for Columbine where Marilyn Manson is the most sensible person interviewed.
I suppose that is one consolation... Esp for people who love vid games :)
And very true re: Bowling for Columbine. Manson is really rather articulate and comes across as generally quite intelligent in interviews. But I guess he still gets blame from people because he's different and challenges some variety of status quo.
Post a Comment